spot_img
HomeCar CultureCommentaryKoenigsegg disputes Bonhams valuation of One:1 going to auction

Koenigsegg disputes Bonhams valuation of One:1 going to auction

-

As we reported in mid-June, Bonhams will offer a 25-vehicle supercar collection at an auction in Switzerland on September 29. Among the cars, seized from an African “prince” found guilty of various crimes, is one of only six 2014 Koenigsegg One:1 vehicles, which the Swedish automaker calls “the world’s first mega car, producing more than one megawatt of power.”

The One:1 reportedly has been driven only 597 kilometers and Bonhams announced a pre-auction estimated value of €1.6 million to €2 million ($1.8 million to $2.25 million).

But in a very unusual move, Koenigsegg has publicly objected to that estimate. 

“Bonhams has put an estimate for the car that is way under market value,” the automaker says on its website. 

“For some reason, not understood by us, Bonhams are uninterested in giving a correct starting point or accurate estimate for the One:1, as they have shown complete lack of interest in trustworthy facts and figures presented to them. At the same time, they are unwilling to substantiate their estimate to us with any facts or findings whatsoever.

“We at Koenigsegg are not willing to stand by on the sidelines and observe this wrongful and harming behavior without reacting.

A Koenigsegg One:1 at speed on the Spa racing circuit | Koenigsegg photo

“In order to give Bonhams a base for a relevant estimate, we have gone out of our way to provide them with all the actual selling prices for the One:1 model known to date. Factual prices that are in some cases more than twice their top-end estimate. None of the prices known are even close to as low as Bonhams’s estimate. The trend shows that values are only increasing.

“Furthermore, Bonhams told us there was a possibility to buy the car pre-auction. Given their initial reluctance to adjust their estimate, we submitted offers substantially higher than that.

“Not only did they decline the offers, they did not even use these relatively low firm offers as reason to correct their estimate to that level. In our view this further shows a total lack of interest in providing transparency to the market and is unfair to the seller and the car.”

All of the cars at the auction, being conducted in behalf of the State of Geneva and its state auctioneer, are being offered with no reserve.

Nonetheless, Koenigsegg continues its argument: “The prime asset of Bonhams is their credibility. Given this, we are bewildered as to why they are totally uninterested in using trustworthy market information as basis for their upcoming auction and instead they choose to stick with numbers that are totally unfounded. Bonhams are simply not doing their job or living up to their reputation as a serious auctioneer.

“Our most recent models, the Regera and Jesko, both sold out in record time. Our older models are all appreciating in value alongside the growth of our company. The star among these models – the limited edition One:1 model, of which only 6 examples were produced (plus a prototype) – have all enjoyed hefty value increases, when sold, contrary to Bonhams’s estimate that indicates a hefty price drop.

“This is not about the auction itself,” Koenigsegg continued. “Given the above, we are confident the car will catch a good value there.  We know there are buyers, including ourselves, who will seek to put their hands on this car.

“The question is, why should bidders, who trust Bonhams’s judgment, not be given a fair chance to jump on the opportunity, instead of stopping their bids short, based on information Bonhams knows is incorrect?

“In effort to provide Bonhams all the opportunities to do the right thing, we sent them a draft of this text in advance so they can correct their estimate. They did revise their estimate slightly to a figure ($2.3 million) that is still not even close to proven market value and substantially lower than our firm offers.

“Given the above, we were unfortunately forced to share our findings and have to conclude that you cannot trust ‘appraisals’ coming from Bonhams.

spot_img
Larry Edsall
Larry Edsall
A former daily newspaper sports editor, Larry Edsall spent a dozen years as an editor at AutoWeek magazine before making the transition to writing for the web and becoming the author of more than 15 automotive books. In addition to being founding editor at ClassicCars.com, Larry has written for The New York Times and The Detroit News and was an adjunct honors professor at the Walter Cronkite School of Journalism and Mass Communication at Arizona State University.

10 COMMENTS

  1. They sgould buy the car back if it is worth more than there estimate!! Why dispute it??? Simple things become So Blown out of the Drama Factor!! Good Luck Whomever Steals this Super Mega Car!!# JS

  2. The point of an auction is the market setting its own level. If Koenigegg considers the bidding runs out of steam too early, presumably their intention to bid would free up a profit margin for themselves?

  3. The auction house sets a price they think will sell the car. The price could go higher as the market for a Koenigsegg is a small niche market. Except for the Autoban, there are not many motorways that you can drive a K to it’s full potential.

  4. Wow, nothing self-serving about Koenigsegg whining about a too-low estimate! This is ridiculous: anyone truly interested in the car knows what they are willing to pay for it, and the auction house estimate is irrelevant. There’s no basis for an argument or even a complaint here. The Journal has been successfully played…

  5. How about putting removing the "estimated" price and allowing the bidding process to show the market? if the excited buyers are out there, then the car will bring the money. This happens all the time. Even if they start at a million, it will not take long for them to get to where they are going. The auctioneer can incrementally go up in larger brackets if needed.

  6. Unfair is unfair. Doesn’t matter if the car is a Model-T Ford or "one of only six 2014 Koenigsegg One:1 vehicles."

  7. Well, K’egg cares because the car is undervalued, and to bajillionaires trying to outdo their neighbors, this is sort of a stick in K’egg’s eye- all of their cars have done nothing but increase in value (I use the DuPont Registry for this type of info), and by every account I have read in three languages (Eng/Fr/Gr), K’egg builds a brilliant product, in every way comparable to, say, Pagani. Maybe not so luxe inside, but I suspect a hammer drop test would favor the K’egg.
    When you build out on the bleeding edge of the possible, ya, maybe some controversy at auction; imo K’egg is right, and their car is undervalued. Maybe the private owner spun a bearing or something; you’d think well, Bonham’s, they’d own it, but they’re a for profit, to be so undervalued, I’d suggest K’egg ask to examine the car, inside, dyno, fluid analysis- then buy the damn thing back- and do the Enzo thing and forbid the owner from ever having one again.
    But at that economic level, people DO care. $$$, donchakno.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Recent Posts

spot_img